Philosophers Condemned by the Inquisition

Giordano Bruno, Galileo Galilei, Tommaso Campanella and Menocchio

4 Comments
Join the Conversation
Many Great Thinkers Were Burnt in the Holy Fire - Sarah G
Many Great Thinkers Were Burnt in the Holy Fire - Sarah G
Giordano Bruno, Galileo, Tommaso Campanella and Menocchio are just a few among many great thinkers that were imprisoned, tortured or burnt by the Church for their ideas.

In the dark ages, whoever was contrary to the Church could be caught by the inquisitors. Those who were accused of heresy and blasphemy would often go through intense torture, perpetual incarceration, painful and slow death. Some courageous thinkers, however, dared to tell the world their ideas at the expense of their lives.

Giordano Bruno – Reincarnation and Plurality of the Worlds

Giordano Bruno was an Italian philosopher, mathematician and astronomer who not only defended the Copernican model of universe but also argued that the sun was only one sun amongst many others that existed in the space. He believed that there were many other worlds and that they were also inhabited.

He was deeply influenced by Hermeticism and Neoplatonism and therefore he argued that the soul incarnates many times in different bodies in order to evolve and that human life could continue in different planets as well as having its origin in other globes, due to a process known as transmigration of the soul.

He interpreted the Bible according to the Hermetic knowledge and argued that certain concepts such as the virginity of Mary, the Trinity and the Transubstantiation had a symbolic meaning that was different from what it was regularly taught. Giordano Bruno was declared guilty of heresy and blasphemy and he was burnt at the stake in 1600.

Galileo Galilei – Defending Heliocentrism

Galileo Galilei was a mathematician, physicist and astronomer who defended the Copernican model of the universe in which the Earth revolved around the sun and not the opposite as scriptures suggested.

He wrote the book Dialogue Concerning Two Chief World Systems in which he presented both models – heliocentrism and geocentrism – in the form of a dialogue.

The pope Urban VIII had asked Galileo to insert his own version of geocentrism in the book and Galileo did it by using a character named Simplicius (simpleton) who advocated that the Earth was the centre of the universe and did not move. The character however, was said to sound pathetic and it became clear to authorities that Galileo was defending the heliocentrism.

Contradicting the Bible was considered a heresy and he was called to the Holy Office to explain himself. At his trial, he said that the Bible shouldn't be taken literally as it was not a book of instructions, and that it was written by humans, therefore, it was subjected to mistakes. Galileo was sentenced to jail, his works were prohibited and later on he was kept under house arrest, where he went blind and died in 1642, but not before writing one of his most important books: Two New Sciences.

Tommaso Campanella – Astrology and Occultism

An Italian philosopher, astrologist, theologist, occultist and poet, Tommaso Campanella used his astrological knowledge to compose his philosophical works. He believed that there would be a time in which the society would not need the Church hierarchy and that Christians and non-Christians would live peacefully towards the same goal. He idealized a republic based on natural principles and according to his astrological observations, around 1600 a new order would bring the Age of the Spirit.

This was enough to provoke the rage of the Church and he was condemned to life imprisonment and was tortured, only escaping from the death penalty because he alleged insanity. However, during the twenty seven years he spent incarcerated, he wrote The City of the Sun, Atheism Conquered , Methaphysica, Theologia, and even an attempt to defend Galileo in his book The Defense of Galileo.

Menocchio (Domenico Scandella) – The Cheese and the Worms

Domenico Scandella, also known as Menocchio, was a Friulian miller whose vision of cosmology could be compared to a cheese and its worms. He believed that God was created at the same the everything else was created, and that He emerged from chaos, just like the worms appeared in a cheese.

Menocchio had the pagan influences typical of the peasants of his region but it is also known that he had contact with the teachings of the Quran as well as with Lutheran ideas. This mix of influences led him to believe that all religions had a common source and that what made a religion different from other was only the cultural difference but, since God was inside every person, everyone had access to God, no matter the religion.

He stated that Mary's virginity, Jesus' crucifixion, the concept of God as creator of the world, the hell and the gospels were forged and accused the Church of protecting exploiters. Menocchio was captured and accused of heresy and died burnt at the stake in 1599.

Despite the Church's attempt to stop free thinking and hide the truth, the message of the great thinkers did not die along with their bodies. All the pain caused by torture instruments and the lost years in jail seem insignificant near the greatness of their thoughts.

Readers might also want to read Philosophy Books Banned and Prohibited by the Catholic Church

Sources:

Ginzburg, Carlo. The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth Century Miller. The John Hopkins University Press, 1992.

AbsoluteAstronomy.com

TTC, TTC

Thais Campos - Thais Campos is a writer that focus on philosophy, arts and literature.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 1+1?

Comments

Jul 2, 2010 7:18 PM
Guest :
This article is quite inaccurate. Galileo, for example, was not sent to jail. During hsi trial he resided at the comfortable apartments of Churchmen and patrons. He was not physically mistreated in any way. His protestant biographer wrote: "One glance at the truest historical source for the famous trial, would convince any one that Galileo spent altogether twenty-two days in the buildings of the Holy Office (i.e. the Inquisition), and even then not in a prison cell with barred windows, but in the handsome and commodious apartment of an official of the Inquisition."

During his "house arrest," he was allowed to use the comfortable houses of friends and could move about. He was not blinded or hurt by the Italian Inquisition. Before Galileo's death the Pope sent his special blessings. Galielo was interred on consecrated ground, in the church of Santa Croce at Florence.

Galileo was not condemned simply for disagreeing with the Church. In the first place, the Church had no dogma on geocentrism. Geocentrism was widely held by the SCIENTIFIC community (such as it was) of the time. Galileo could not conclusively prove his theory; the evidence for that came AFTER his death. Yet he taught it as it it was a fact, not a theory.

Worse, he publicly insulted and ridiculed the Pope in his "Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic & Copernican." He deliberately went against the friendly advice of his patrons in the Church. His own acerbic character got him into trouble.

The affair was probably more a personal conflict and did not really involve the dpoctrines of the Church. Pope Urban was going too far himself Professor Augustus De Morgan, in "Budget of Paradoxes," notes the folliwng:

"It is clear that the absurdity was the act of the Italian Inquisition, for the private and personal pleasure of the pope — who knew that the course he took could not convict him as pope — and not of the body which calls itself the Church."

It is not at all accurate to imply that the Church was against science or suppressed it. In fact the Church was one of the foremost patrons of science. Much of what we take for granted now -- including literacy -- would not be around had the Church not worked to promote or preserve it.
Jul 8, 2010 10:18 PM
Guest :
Ummmm... actually, the church was afraid of science becoming the new religion, hence horded knowledge for its own betterment.
Jul 10, 2010 11:06 AM
Guest :
OMG! I am replying this for the first person who commented.

honestly, I can't believe that there are still people out there that defend the church when it was OBVIOUS that no person was allowed to be contrary to catholicism. do you really think that the church condemned all those people simply because their theories weren't "proven" like you said? the geocentric model was'nt proven either, and nobody was killed or put in jail for saying that the earth was the centre of the universe!! so all thinkers could speculate as much as they wanted as long as they said that the bible was right, aren't they nice??? C'mon!!!!! Wake up! besides, the article says very clearly that galielo was sent to house arrest, so it's pretty accurate. are you going to say that Giordano Bruno wasn't killed either? LOL
Nov 6, 2010 4:24 AM
Guest :
The article is good enough as a general overview and as a basis for further research.

One should probably recall 'dark ages' followed the falling apart of the western part of Roman Empire, and in and after the chaos of that feudal system might have been seen as a light at the end of the tunnel, more then as the beginning of the night. Comparing.

Like actions of Adolf Hitler at the end of the great depression in Germany made him elected to office in Berlin...

To the commenters:
I also encountered data about Galileo's character and not having proofs for heliocentric system seriously influencing his process. And I mostly agree with the second comment.
The third comment starting with abbreviated 'Oh my god' and OBVIOUS role of church and Wake up... made me answer.

From my point of view, a lot of at first glance obvious things later proved (at least partially) wrong, and in this case of high emotions and no arguments it seemed as the writer could be an anti-church believer; that is somebody who has been taught that church was obviously demonic.

RC church probably had (and has) different roles in science in different periods. At least part of the time (and possibly most of the time) it tried to keep 'uninitiated people' from the knowledge they thought shouldn't have access to it.

It is not free of it even now - or at leas the members of it are not. After I read some of works of and about Ignatius Loyola and tried to discuss it with a young priest, he got mad at me for being able to access that info without been initiated first. What I wanted to discuss was that seeing the 'accounting' view of hoarding every act valuable in the eyes of god and beneficial to people might be a kind of greed. After his reaction and my analysis how and why he was conditioned to react so I got much much more wary about church's declared intentions.

Different people in church seem to have had different intentions with that - but the sistematic comparation of common people in church to flock can be seen as the sheep do not have the 'need to know'. They have to be protected - and the shepherd might need knowledge to do it. If we look at the benevolent side.

If we look for a not so benevolent side, sheep had no need to know, to make them let the shepherd fleece them.

Church kept a lot of knowledge. But it looks it also destroyed a lot of it. If I recall data on counter reformation correctly, a lot of knowledge was banned, and books burned. Not books only, people found to disagree were declared heretics and during several centuries also burned (look for Church legislation on heresy in http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07256b.htm and similar).

If I summarise the analysis of contents of the link I gave above, from the point of view of general systems theory, RC church needed cohesion to survive, for that it needed supreme authority, so it declared itself and its leadership infallible, and suppressed oposition.

They seem to have influenced rulers (including through their confessors, tutors while minors etc.) to develop legal environment in such a way that the civil legislation administered burning at stake as punishment for heresy.

So don't idolize it, but also don't demonize it. The article on the link given above gives all the explanation necessary why it happened, and a lot of how - and the way it is written shows the same goals are still actual. The church just tries to survive, probably at any cost, and succeeded so far.
4 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement